AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real

293

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 297 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 14 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

4 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/docs/SKILL.md, /repo/docs/adr/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

20 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/.temp/summary.md, /repo/.temp/implementation-notes.md, /repo/.temp/common-pitfalls.md and 17 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH
Files: /repo/.temp/summary.md, /repo/.temp/implementation-notes.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/.temp/SKILL.md, /repo/.ai/SKILL.md and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/.temp/SKILL.md, /repo/.ai/SKILL.md and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 AAK-MCP-LITELLM-CVE-2026-59822-001
Files: pyproject.toml, uv.lock · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 CVE-2026-25580
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
2 GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Multiple critical and high severity vulnerabilities identified.

The artifact contains numerous critical and high severity vulnerabilities primarily within its dependencies, as indicated by findings in `uv.lock` and `pyproject.toml`. Specific high severity findings suggest potential resource abuse in `/repo/apps/cli/app.py` and vulnerabilities in SDK components that could lead to credential access or other sensitive operations. These findings warrant immediate attention due to the potential for significant impact.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-2102 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2118 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2120 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-287 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-338 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-36 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-373 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-388 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-390 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real

293

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 297 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 14 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

4 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/docs/SKILL.md, /repo/docs/adr/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

20 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/.temp/summary.md, /repo/.temp/implementation-notes.md, /repo/.temp/common-pitfalls.md and 17 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH
Files: /repo/.temp/summary.md, /repo/.temp/implementation-notes.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/.temp/SKILL.md, /repo/.ai/SKILL.md and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/.temp/SKILL.md, /repo/.ai/SKILL.md and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 AAK-MCP-LITELLM-CVE-2026-59822-001
Files: pyproject.toml, uv.lock · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 CVE-2026-25580
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
2 GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Multiple critical and high severity vulnerabilities identified.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-2102 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2118 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2120 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-287 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-338 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-36 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-373 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-388 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-390 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

semantica-copilot

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (5)

agentshield

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (5)

agentshield

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged31

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at