AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real

445

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 454 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 8 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

8 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-SECRET-004 · Files: test_swift_sidecar_hex.py, test_swift_sidecar_fixed.py, test_drift_setup.py and 5 more · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/ci.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

70 AAK-SECRET-004
Files: .beta_dev_wallet.json, create_correct_wallet.py, fix_wallet_file_64.py and 31 more · reported by agent-audit-kit
3 CVE-2026-48779
Files: services/jit-maker/package-lock.json, services/swift-mm/package-lock.json · reported by trivy
3 GHSA-96hv-2xvq-fx4p
Files: /repo/services/jit-maker/package-lock.json, /repo/services/swift-mm/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 PYSEC-2026-1845
Files: /repo/patches_old/v1.17.0-RC_merged/requirements.txt, /repo/requirements-dev.txt, /repo/requirements.txt · reported by osv-scanner
2 AAK-SPLUNK-TOKLOG-001
Files: setup_environment.py, drift-bots/libs/drift/drivers/swift.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 CVE-2025-15284

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 AAK-METIS-SCORING-SINK-001
Files: run_30_day_ab_hedge_test.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 CVE-2026-11525
Files: services/swift-mm/package-lock.json · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and exposed credentials found in artifact.

The artifact includes critical vulnerabilities in its Python and Node.js dependencies, as identified in `requirements.txt` and `package-lock.json`. Additionally, several high-severity findings indicate the presence of exposed credentials within various Python scripts and JSON wallet files. These exposed credentials could grant unauthorized access to sensitive systems or accounts, and the critical vulnerabilities could lead to severe system compromises.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-2102 · /repo/patches_old/v1.17.0-RC_merged/requirements.txt · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2102 · /repo/requirements.txt · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2120 · /repo/requirements.txt · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-348 · /repo/requirements.txt · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp · /repo/services/jit-maker/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-xq3m-2v4x-88gg · /repo/services/jit-maker/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2025-43859 · requirements.txt · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2026-41242 · · critical · reported by trivy

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real

445

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 454 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 8 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

8 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-SECRET-004 · Files: test_swift_sidecar_hex.py, test_swift_sidecar_fixed.py, test_drift_setup.py and 5 more · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/ci.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit

In installed code — never dismissed

70 AAK-SECRET-004
Files: .beta_dev_wallet.json, create_correct_wallet.py, fix_wallet_file_64.py and 31 more · reported by agent-audit-kit
3 CVE-2026-48779
Files: services/jit-maker/package-lock.json, services/swift-mm/package-lock.json · reported by trivy
3 GHSA-96hv-2xvq-fx4p
Files: /repo/services/jit-maker/package-lock.json, /repo/services/swift-mm/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 PYSEC-2026-1845
Files: /repo/patches_old/v1.17.0-RC_merged/requirements.txt, /repo/requirements-dev.txt, /repo/requirements.txt · reported by osv-scanner
2 AAK-SPLUNK-TOKLOG-001
Files: setup_environment.py, drift-bots/libs/drift/drivers/swift.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 CVE-2025-15284

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 AAK-METIS-SCORING-SINK-001
Files: run_30_day_ab_hedge_test.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 CVE-2026-11525
Files: services/swift-mm/package-lock.json · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and exposed credentials found in artifact.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-2102 · /repo/patches_old/v1.17.0-RC_merged/requirements.txt · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2102 · /repo/requirements.txt · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2120 · /repo/requirements.txt · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-348 · /repo/requirements.txt · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp · /repo/services/jit-maker/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-xq3m-2v4x-88gg · /repo/services/jit-maker/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2025-43859 · requirements.txt · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2026-41242 · · critical · reported by trivy

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

driftbot

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (5)

agentshield

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (5)

agentshield

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged0

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at