Loading the registry…
MCP server for crawling websites and extracting assets
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
3 critical findings reported by osv-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- site-crawler-mcp
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
6 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
5 findings · 8.8s
v0.3.74
9 findings · 1.8s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.3s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.3s
v0.71.0
56 findings · 0.3s
v2.3.8
105 findings · 1.5s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 2.2s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Flagged38 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 175 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 3 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 140 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
2 PYSEC-2026-1097
Files: /repo/requirements.txt, /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
2 PYSEC-2026-1099
Files: /repo/requirements.txt, /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
2 PYSEC-2026-1105
Files: /repo/requirements.txt, /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
2 PYSEC-2026-1109
Files: /repo/requirements.txt, /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 CVE-2025-69224
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-69225
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-69226
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-69230
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-34513
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-34514
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-34517
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-34518
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-34519
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-34520
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-4539
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48710
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-50269
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-53537
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-53538
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-53540
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-54275
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-54277
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-54279
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-54280
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 DATA_EXFIL_NETWORK_REQUESTS
Files: /repo/src/site_crawler/crawler.py · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1104
Files: /repo/requirements.txt · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2987
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3037
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3040
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3041
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
137 The model's answer could not be read.
Rules: PYSEC-2026-2102, PYSEC-2026-2120, AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001 and 97 more · Files: /repo/requirements.txt, /repo/uv.lock, pyproject.toml and 6 more · reported by osv-scanner, agent-audit-kit, trivy and 1 more
3 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: AAK-SEC-MD-001, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: SECURITY.md, /repo/SKILL.md · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner
Critical vulnerabilities found in dependencies and SDK usage.
The artifact contains critical vulnerabilities in its Python dependencies, specifically identified in `/repo/requirements.txt` and `/repo/uv.lock`. Additionally, high-severity findings indicate potential DNS rebinding risks in `pyproject.toml` and issues with SDK usage in `src/site_crawler/server.py`. These findings suggest capabilities for network egress and potential for bypassing local network controls.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.
Showing 25 of 75; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.