Loading the registry…
GLM-4.6V-Flash 免费视觉模型 MCP 服务器：理解本地图片或网络图片
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
pypi: glm-vision-mcp-server @ 0.1.0, 0 findings
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- glm-vision-mcp-server
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
8 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 0.6s
v2.0.11
7 findings · 7.0s
v0.3.74
6 findings · 1.8s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.2s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.2s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 7.6s
v0.71.0
8 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
9 findings · 1.4s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Flagged48 | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 30 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 3 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
4 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/docs/SKILL.md, /repo/docs/superpowers/plans/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
2 AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001
Files: pyproject.toml, uv.lock · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-DNS-REBIND-002
Files: pyproject.toml · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MCP-NOAUTH-DEFAULT
Files: src/glm_vision_mcp/glm_client.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-OAUTH-3P-001
Files: pyproject.toml · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 CVE-2025-66416
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-32597
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48522
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48524
3 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: AAK-SEC-MD-001, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: SECURITY.md, /repo/.claude/skills/glm-vision/SKILL.md, /repo/SKILL.md · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner
High-severity vulnerabilities in client and dependencies.
The artifact contains a client component (`glm_client.py`) configured with a default no-authentication setting, which could permit unauthorized access. A DNS rebinding vulnerability is also present, potentially allowing manipulation of network egress. Additionally, numerous high-severity vulnerabilities exist within included dependencies, including specific CVEs in an SDK, which could lead to various security compromises.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48525
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48526
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-52869
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-59950
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 PYSEC-2025-183
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-120
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1617
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-175
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-177
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-178
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-179
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3482
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3483
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner