gcp-mcp-server · Nerlo

gcp-mcp-server

Version: v1.4.0
By: StartupManch Inc. - Devesh Kumar
License: MIT
Last scan: Scanned Aug 19, 2026, 10:03 PM UTC

MCP Server

Flagged43composite

Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Google Cloud Platform - Talk to your GCP resources

Source:: github.com/StartupManch/gcp-mcp-server
Version:: 1.4.0
License:: MIT
Author:: StartupManch Inc. - Devesh Kumar
Provenance:: Found by crawling (provenance, not a security rating)

We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.

7 critical findings reported by trivy, osv-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.

github_release: https://github.com/StartupManch/gcp-mcp-server, 0 findings

Install

Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.

nerlo install --target claude-code -- gcp-mcp-server

Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.

How scores work Full audit report

Per-scanner reports

11 scanners

Your view:

8 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.

Scanners that examined this package (8)

agentshield
v1.4.0
Clean100
- No findings
0 findings · 0.6s
cisco-skill-scanner
v2.0.11
Clean93
- 6Low
- 8Info
14 findings · 9.7s

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 165
Dismissed as false positives: 16
Not reviewed: 5

Out of 186 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 7 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 5 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

9 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-fetch-raw-then-run, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-pipe-to-shell, PIPELINE_TAINT_FLOW and 2 more · Files: /repo/docs/TROUBLESHOOTING.md, /repo/docs/SKILL.md, /repo/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/SKILL.md · reported by nerlo-install-instruction, cisco-skill-scanner
6 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME · Files: .github/workflows/ci.yml, /repo/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/SKILL.md · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner
1 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-ANTHROPIC-SDK-001 · Files: tests/test-gcp-full.mjs · reported by agent-audit-kit

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

3 GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 CVE-2026-41907
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
2 CVE-2026-44288

Not reviewed

5 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: AAK-SEC-MD-001, HIDDEN_DATA_FILE, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION and 1 more · Files: SECURITY.md, /repo/.prettierrc.json, /repo/.gitmessage and 1 more · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and risky capabilities detected.

The artifact contains multiple critical-severity vulnerabilities in its dependencies, which could lead to remote code execution or data exposure. Findings also indicate potential for DNS rebinding in `package.json` and usage of the Anthropic SDK in `src/server.ts`, suggesting network egress and potential credential access. These issues warrant immediate attention before deployment.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-2w6w-674q-4c4q · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-m7jm-9gc2-mpf2 · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-xq3m-2v4x-88gg · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2026-25896 · package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2026-41242 · package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
AAK-DNS-REBIND-002 · package.json · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
· · high · reported by agent-audit-kit

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 19, 2026	Flagged43	—	agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 165
Dismissed as false positives: 16
Not reviewed: 5

Out of 186 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 7 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 5 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

9 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-fetch-raw-then-run, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-pipe-to-shell, PIPELINE_TAINT_FLOW and 2 more · Files: /repo/docs/TROUBLESHOOTING.md, /repo/docs/SKILL.md, /repo/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/SKILL.md · reported by nerlo-install-instruction, cisco-skill-scanner
6 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME · Files: .github/workflows/ci.yml, /repo/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/SKILL.md · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner
1 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-ANTHROPIC-SDK-001 · Files: tests/test-gcp-full.mjs · reported by agent-audit-kit

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

3 GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 CVE-2026-41907
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
2 CVE-2026-44288

Not reviewed

5 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: AAK-SEC-MD-001, HIDDEN_DATA_FILE, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION and 1 more · Files: SECURITY.md, /repo/.prettierrc.json, /repo/.gitmessage and 1 more · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and risky capabilities detected.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-2w6w-674q-4c4q · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-m7jm-9gc2-mpf2 · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-xq3m-2v4x-88gg · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2026-25896 · package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2026-41242 · package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
AAK-DNS-REBIND-002 · package.json · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
· · high · reported by agent-audit-kit

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

gcp-mcp-server

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (8)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (3)

capslock

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (8)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (3)

capslock

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged43

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at