Loading the registry…
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
5 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner, 0 of them in the installed artifact. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI. Review the scanned source before copying them into your own project.
nerlo install -- h2-fcu-modern-dashboard
7 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 0.9s
v2.0.11
25 findings · 8.2s
v0.3.74
2 findings · 14.4s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.6s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.6s
v0.71.0
0 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
14 findings · 6.7s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.9s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | Flagged63 | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 41 findings across every scanner that examined this package. 5 of 5 findings rated critical by their scanner were among the dismissals.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
5 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: COMMAND_INJECTION_EVAL · Files: /repo/model/test_feature_policy.py · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/docs/plans/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-AGENT-002 · Files: AGENTS.md · reported by agent-audit-kit
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
8 YARA_embedded_pe_executable
Files: /repo/backend/kerneldlls/ControlCAN.dll · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 HOMOGLYPH_ATTACK
Files: /repo/backend/diagnosis.py, /repo/model/ceo_qaadam_emstgat_trainer.py, /repo/backend/can_protocol.py and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 AAK-LEGAL-002
Files: package.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 BINARY_FILE_DETECTED
Files: /repo/backend/kerneldlls/ControlCAN.dll · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 GHSA-28wg-ghj8-5hjv
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-4w7w-66w2-5vf9
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-4x5r-pxfx-6jf8
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-6g55-p6wh-862q
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-fx2h-pf6j-xcff
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-fxqj-rqcc-2cmp
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-mw96-cpmx-2vgc
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-p9ff-h696-f583
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-qx2v-qp2m-jg93
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-r28c-9q8g-f849
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-v6wh-96g9-6wx3
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 LOW_ANALYZABILITY
Files: /repo · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 OVERSIZED_FILE
Files: /repo/model/results_testdata_80_20/ceo_qaadam_emstgat.keras · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 UNANALYZABLE_BINARY
Files: /repo/backend/kerneldlls/ControlCAN.dll · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
High-severity vulnerabilities and code obfuscation detected.
The artifact contains multiple high-severity vulnerabilities, including several GHSA advisories in its dependencies, which could lead to various security compromises. Homoglyph attacks are present in multiple Python files, indicating potential code confusion or obfuscation. Additionally, the artifact exhibits low analyzability and contains unanalyzable binaries, hindering comprehensive security assessment.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.