binance-mate-mcp · Nerlo

binance-mate-mcp

Version: v1.1.2
By: bqkode
License: MIT
Last scan: Scanned Aug 20, 2026, 8:52 AM UTC

MCP Server

Flagged45composite

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that connects AI assistants to your Binance account for intelligent crypto portfolio analysis and market insights.

Source:: github.com/bqkode/binance-mate-mcp
Version:: 1.1.2
License:: MIT
Author:: bqkode
Provenance:: Found by crawling (provenance, not a security rating)

We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.

4 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner, agent-audit-kit, trivy, osv-scanner, 2 of them in the installed artifact. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.

npm: binance-mate-mcp @ 1.1.2, 0 findings

Install

Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.

nerlo install --target claude-code -- binance-mate-mcp

Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.

How scores work Full audit report

Per-scanner reports

11 scanners

Your view:

8 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.

Scanners that examined this package (8)

agentshield
v1.4.0
Clean100
- No findings
0 findings · 0.6s
cisco-skill-scanner
v2.0.11
Caution84
- 1Crit
- 4Info
5 findings · 6.1s

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 170
Dismissed as false positives: 3
Not reviewed: 14

Out of 187 findings across every scanner that examined this package. 2 of 4 findings rated critical by their scanner were among the dismissals.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 14 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

3 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-MCP-STDIO-CMD-INJ-002, COMMAND_INJECTION_JS_CHILD_PROCESS, AAK-ANTHROPIC-SDK-001 · Files: src/__tests__/integration.test.ts, /repo/src/__tests__/integration.test.ts · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

3 GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 CVE-2025-69873
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
2 GHSA-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p

Not reviewed

13 The review budget for this scan was already spent before these findings were reached.
Rules: CVE-2025-68157, AAK-SUPPLY-005, GHSA-38r7-794h-5758 and 10 more · Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/SKILL.md and 2 more · reported by trivy, agent-audit-kit, osv-scanner and 1 more
1 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: AAK-SEC-MD-001 · Files: SECURITY.md · reported by agent-audit-kit

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities found in dependencies and code

The artifact includes critical vulnerabilities in its declared dependencies, identified in `package-lock.json`. Multiple high-severity findings are also present, including a potential DNS rebinding vulnerability in `package.json` and an issue related to the Anthropic SDK in `src/index.ts`. These findings indicate risks such as unauthorized network egress and potential credential exposure.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2025-7783 · package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
AAK-DNS-REBIND-002 · package.json · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
AAK-ANTHROPIC-SDK-001 · src/index.ts · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-28wg-ghj8-5hjv · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
· · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 20, 2026	Flagged45	—	agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 170
Dismissed as false positives: 3
Not reviewed: 14

Out of 187 findings across every scanner that examined this package. 2 of 4 findings rated critical by their scanner were among the dismissals.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 14 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

3 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-MCP-STDIO-CMD-INJ-002, COMMAND_INJECTION_JS_CHILD_PROCESS, AAK-ANTHROPIC-SDK-001 · Files: src/__tests__/integration.test.ts, /repo/src/__tests__/integration.test.ts · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

3 GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 CVE-2025-69873
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
2 GHSA-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p

Not reviewed

13 The review budget for this scan was already spent before these findings were reached.
Rules: CVE-2025-68157, AAK-SUPPLY-005, GHSA-38r7-794h-5758 and 10 more · Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/SKILL.md and 2 more · reported by trivy, agent-audit-kit, osv-scanner and 1 more
1 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: AAK-SEC-MD-001 · Files: SECURITY.md · reported by agent-audit-kit

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities found in dependencies and code

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2025-7783 · package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
AAK-DNS-REBIND-002 · package.json · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
AAK-ANTHROPIC-SDK-001 · src/index.ts · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-28wg-ghj8-5hjv · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
· · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

binance-mate-mcp

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (8)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (3)

capslock

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (8)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (3)

capslock

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged45

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at