We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- mallprogram
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
5 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 1.0s
v2.0.11
29 findings · 17.3s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Per-scanner history:
v0.3.74
3 findings · 10.3s
v0.1.0
1 finding · 7.3s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 7.3s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.2s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 33 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
11 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/mall-admin/.env.production, /repo/mall-server.zip!/mall-server/.env.development, /repo/mall-admin/.env.development and 5 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
7 YARA_prompt_injection_unicode_steganography
Files: /repo/mall-server.zip!/mall-server/uploads/file-1751349026623-383191776.png, /repo/mall-server.zip!/mall-server/uploads/file-1751357108719-474445622.png, /repo/手稿示意图/首页.jpg and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 AAK-LEGAL-002
Files: package.json, mall-admin/package.json, mall-server/package.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/mall-server.zip!/mall-server/src/routes/user.js, /repo/mall-server/src/routes/user.js · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 LOW_ANALYZABILITY
Files: /repo/mall-admin, /repo · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/mall-admin/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/mall-admin/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 EXCESSIVE_FILE_COUNT
Files: /repo/. · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH
Files: /repo/服务器部署上线详细指南.txt · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-js-secret-to-network-egress
Files: /repo/mall-server/src/routes/user.js · reported by nerlo-behavioral
1 OVERSIZED_FILE
Files: /repo/mall-server.zip · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
High risk of credential exposure and network egress
The artifact includes code that can expose secrets or credentials via network egress, specifically identified in `/repo/mall-server/src/routes/user.js`. Multiple medium severity findings indicate potential for prompt injection and file magic mismatches, suggesting unusual content or behavior. Further low severity findings point to hidden data files and excessive file counts.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.