MCP-GraphSecurityIncidents · Nerlo

MCP-GraphSecurityIncidents

Last scan: Scanned Aug 19, 2026, 10:29 PM UTC

MCP Server

Flagged79composite

Source:: github.com/LaurieRhodes/MCP-GraphSecurityIncidents
Provenance:: Found by crawling (provenance, not a security rating)

We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.

Install

Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.

nerlo install --target claude-code -- MCP-GraphSecurityIncidents

Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.

How scores work Full audit report

Per-scanner reports

11 scanners

Your view:

8 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.

Scanners that examined this package (8)

cisco-skill-scanner
v2.0.11
Clean94
- 14Info
14 findings · 11.1s

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 66
Dismissed as false positives: 2
Not reviewed: 16

Out of 84 findings across every scanner that examined this package.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 16 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

2 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/docs/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

2 CAPABILITY_UNSAFE_POINTER
Reported by capslock
2 GO-2026-5026
Files: internal/graph/client.go, /repo/go.mod · reported by govulncheck, osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-5972
Files: cmd/server/main.go, /repo/go.mod · reported by govulncheck, osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-6090
Files: internal/graph/client.go, /repo/go.mod · reported by govulncheck, osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-6218
Files: internal/graph/client.go, /repo/go.mod · reported by govulncheck, osv-scanner
1 CAPABILITY_MODIFY_SYSTEM_STATE
Reported by capslock
1 GO-2024-3105
Files: /repo/go.mod · reported by osv-scanner
1 GO-2024-3106

Not reviewed

16 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: GO-2026-5942, GO-2026-6089, GO-2026-6091 and 3 more · Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/internal/context/SKILL.md, /repo/internal/entities/SKILL.md and 3 more · reported by govulncheck, cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

High-severity findings include credential access and critical vulnerabilities.

The artifact exhibits high-severity findings for credential access in `internal/auth/managed_identity.go` and `internal/config/config.go`. Unsafe pointer usage is detected, which could enable memory manipulation or arbitrary execution. Additionally, multiple high-severity vulnerabilities (GO-2026-5972, GO-2026-5026, GO-2026-6090, GO-2026-6218) are present in `cmd/server/main.go` and `internal/graph/client.go`. These vulnerabilities may allow network egress or shell execution.

Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

CAPABILITY_UNSAFE_POINTER · · high · reported by capslock
CAPABILITY_UNSAFE_POINTER · · high · reported by capslock
GO-2026-5972 · cmd/server/main.go · high · reported by govulncheck
GO-2026-5026 · internal/graph/client.go · high · reported by govulncheck
GO-2026-6090 · internal/graph/client.go · high · reported by govulncheck
GO-2026-6218 · internal/graph/client.go · high · reported by govulncheck

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 19, 2026	Flagged79	—	agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock: completenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicable

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 66
Dismissed as false positives: 2
Not reviewed: 16

Out of 84 findings across every scanner that examined this package.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 16 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

2 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/docs/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

2 CAPABILITY_UNSAFE_POINTER
Reported by capslock
2 GO-2026-5026
Files: internal/graph/client.go, /repo/go.mod · reported by govulncheck, osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-5972
Files: cmd/server/main.go, /repo/go.mod · reported by govulncheck, osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-6090
Files: internal/graph/client.go, /repo/go.mod · reported by govulncheck, osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-6218
Files: internal/graph/client.go, /repo/go.mod · reported by govulncheck, osv-scanner
1 CAPABILITY_MODIFY_SYSTEM_STATE
Reported by capslock
1 GO-2024-3105
Files: /repo/go.mod · reported by osv-scanner
1 GO-2024-3106

Not reviewed

16 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: GO-2026-5942, GO-2026-6089, GO-2026-6091 and 3 more · Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/internal/context/SKILL.md, /repo/internal/entities/SKILL.md and 3 more · reported by govulncheck, cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

High-severity findings include credential access and critical vulnerabilities.

Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

CAPABILITY_UNSAFE_POINTER · · high · reported by capslock
CAPABILITY_UNSAFE_POINTER · · high · reported by capslock
GO-2026-5972 · cmd/server/main.go · high · reported by govulncheck
GO-2026-5026 · internal/graph/client.go · high · reported by govulncheck
GO-2026-6090 · internal/graph/client.go · high · reported by govulncheck
GO-2026-6218 · internal/graph/client.go · high · reported by govulncheck

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

MCP-GraphSecurityIncidents

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (8)

cisco-skill-scanner

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

capslock

trivy

osv-scanner

govulncheck

Scanners that did not run on this package (3)

agentshield

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (8)

cisco-skill-scanner

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged79

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

capslock

trivy

osv-scanner

govulncheck

Scanners that did not run on this package (3)

agentshield

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at