AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real

120

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 123 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 2 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

2 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/docs/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/release-and-publish.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

6 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/skills/java-verification/SKILL.md, /repo/skills/java-navigation/SKILL.md, /repo/skills/java-lifecycle/SKILL.md and 3 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 COMMAND_INJECTION_JS_CHILD_PROCESS
Files: /repo/src/language-server.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 GHSA-26pp-8wgv-hjvm
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
2 GHSA-frvp-7c67-39w9
Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-gq3j-xvxp-8hrf
Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-v8w9-8mx6-g223

What the review concluded

Critical command injection and high-severity vulnerabilities present

The artifact contains critical command injection vulnerabilities in `language-server.ts` that could lead to shell execution. Dynamic code execution is also identified in `language-server.ts`. Additionally, a high-severity finding related to the Anthropic SDK is present in `src/index.ts`, which may involve credential access or network egress. Numerous high-severity vulnerabilities are also identified in dependencies listed in `package-lock.json`.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

COMMAND_INJECTION_JS_CHILD_PROCESS · /repo/src/language-server.ts · critical · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
COMMAND_INJECTION_JS_CHILD_PROCESS · /repo/src/language-server.ts · critical · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
AAK-ANTHROPIC-SDK-001 · src/index.ts · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-dynamic-exec · /repo/src/language-server.ts · high · reported by nerlo-behavioral
GHSA-345p-7cg4-v4c7 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-3vhc-576x-3qv4 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-4c8g-83qw-93j6 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
· · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real

120

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 123 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 2 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

2 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/docs/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/release-and-publish.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit

In installed code — never dismissed

6 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/skills/java-verification/SKILL.md, /repo/skills/java-navigation/SKILL.md, /repo/skills/java-lifecycle/SKILL.md and 3 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 COMMAND_INJECTION_JS_CHILD_PROCESS
Files: /repo/src/language-server.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 GHSA-26pp-8wgv-hjvm
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
2 GHSA-frvp-7c67-39w9
Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-gq3j-xvxp-8hrf
Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-v8w9-8mx6-g223

What the review concluded

Critical command injection and high-severity vulnerabilities present

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

COMMAND_INJECTION_JS_CHILD_PROCESS · /repo/src/language-server.ts · critical · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
COMMAND_INJECTION_JS_CHILD_PROCESS · /repo/src/language-server.ts · critical · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
AAK-ANTHROPIC-SDK-001 · src/index.ts · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-dynamic-exec · /repo/src/language-server.ts · high · reported by nerlo-behavioral
GHSA-345p-7cg4-v4c7 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-3vhc-576x-3qv4 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-4c8g-83qw-93j6 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
· · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Sep 3, 2026	Flagged35	—	agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed
Aug 11, 2026	Scan Halted	—	agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicable	rejected

@sachiewonder/java-jdtls-mcp-server

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged35

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

What the review concluded

What to look at