algorima/trade-safety · Nerlo

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 195
Dismissed as false positives: 3
Not reviewed: 199

Out of 397 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 7 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 199 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

3 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/frontend-ci.yml, .github/workflows/publish-backend.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

5 GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74
Files: /repo/frontend/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
5 GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26
Files: /repo/frontend/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
5 GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj
Files: /repo/frontend/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6
Files: /repo/frontend/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj
Files: /repo/frontend/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-py-secret-to-network-egress
Files: /repo/backend/trade_safety/reddit_extract_text_service.py, /repo/backend/trade_safety/twitter_extract_text_service.py · reported by nerlo-behavioral

Not reviewed

195 The review budget for this scan was already spent before these findings were reached.
Rules: GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p, DATA_EXFIL_NETWORK_REQUESTS, SECRET_PASSWORD_VAR and 150 more · Files: /repo/frontend/package-lock.json, /repo/backend/trade_safety/reddit_extract_text_service.py, /repo/backend/tests/unit/test_url_validation.py and 23 more · reported by osv-scanner, cisco-skill-scanner, trivy and 1 more
4 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: DATA_EXFIL_NETWORK_REQUESTS · Files: /repo/backend/trade_safety/reddit_extract_text_service.py, /repo/backend/trade_safety/twitter_extract_text_service.py · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and potential secret exfiltration detected.

Multiple critical vulnerabilities are present in the artifact's dependencies, identified in `poetry.lock` and `package-lock.json`. Behavioral analysis also indicates potential for credential access and network egress from `reddit_extract_text_service.py` and `twitter_extract_text_service.py`. These findings suggest the artifact could expose sensitive information or facilitate unauthorized external communication.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-2102 · /repo/backend/poetry.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2120 · /repo/backend/poetry.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-373 · /repo/backend/poetry.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/frontend/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/frontend/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-2w6w-674q-4c4q · /repo/frontend/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2025-68664 · backend/poetry.lock · critical · reported by trivy
LOW_ANALYZABILITY · /repo · high · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 20, 2026	Flagged31	—	agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 195
Dismissed as false positives: 3
Not reviewed: 199

Out of 397 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 7 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 199 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

3 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/frontend-ci.yml, .github/workflows/publish-backend.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

5 GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74
Files: /repo/frontend/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
5 GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26
Files: /repo/frontend/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
5 GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj
Files: /repo/frontend/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6
Files: /repo/frontend/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj
Files: /repo/frontend/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-py-secret-to-network-egress
Files: /repo/backend/trade_safety/reddit_extract_text_service.py, /repo/backend/trade_safety/twitter_extract_text_service.py · reported by nerlo-behavioral

Not reviewed

195 The review budget for this scan was already spent before these findings were reached.
Rules: GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p, DATA_EXFIL_NETWORK_REQUESTS, SECRET_PASSWORD_VAR and 150 more · Files: /repo/frontend/package-lock.json, /repo/backend/trade_safety/reddit_extract_text_service.py, /repo/backend/tests/unit/test_url_validation.py and 23 more · reported by osv-scanner, cisco-skill-scanner, trivy and 1 more
4 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: DATA_EXFIL_NETWORK_REQUESTS · Files: /repo/backend/trade_safety/reddit_extract_text_service.py, /repo/backend/trade_safety/twitter_extract_text_service.py · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and potential secret exfiltration detected.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-2102 · /repo/backend/poetry.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2120 · /repo/backend/poetry.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-373 · /repo/backend/poetry.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/frontend/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/frontend/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-2w6w-674q-4c4q · /repo/frontend/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2025-68664 · backend/poetry.lock · critical · reported by trivy
LOW_ANALYZABILITY · /repo · high · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

algorima/trade-safety

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (5)

agentshield

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (5)

agentshield

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged31

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at