monorepo-starter · Nerlo

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 442
Dismissed as false positives: 7
Not reviewed: 1

Out of 450 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 17 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 1 finding stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

4 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001, permissions-no-block, hooks-no-pretooluse · Files: .github/workflows/ci.yml, .github/workflows/release.yml, .vscode/settings.json · reported by agent-audit-kit, agentshield
3 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/.github/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

7 AAK-LEGAL-002
Files: package.json, packages/db/package.json, packages/typescript-config/package.json and 4 more · reported by agent-audit-kit
4 DATA_EXFIL_JS_FS_ACCESS
Files: /repo/apps/tanstack-start/src/mcp-todos.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 AAK-MCP-018
Files: apps/tanstack-start/src/routes/mcp.ts, apps/tanstack-start/src/utils/mcp-handler.ts, apps/tanstack-start/src/utils/demo.sse.ts · reported by agent-audit-kit
3 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/apps/nextjs/src/lib/api-client.ts, /repo/apps/tanstack-start/src/lib/api-client.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 GHSA-2vg6-77g8-24mp
Files: pnpm-lock.yaml, /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
3 GHSA-569q-mpph-wgww

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-11525
Files: pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy
1 GHSA-mwv9-gp5h-frr4
Files: pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy

Not reviewed

1 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: HIDDEN_DATA_FILE · Files: /repo/apps/nextjs/.env.local.example · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

Artifact contains critical vulnerabilities in dependencies.

The artifact includes dependencies with multiple critical vulnerabilities, such as GHSA-xg6x-h9c9-2m83 and CVE-2026-53512, identified in pnpm-lock.yaml. These issues could lead to various impacts depending on the specific vulnerability, including potential for remote code execution or data compromise. Several high-severity vulnerabilities are also present, further increasing the overall risk. Reviewing the listed critical findings in the dependency lock file is strongly advised.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-2w6w-674q-4c4q · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-3qcw-2rhx-2726 · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-9qr9-h5gf-34mp · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-g8mr-85jm-7xhm · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-mv8w-475r-vwqw · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-p63j-vcc4-9vmv · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 22, 2026	Flagged40	—	agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 442
Dismissed as false positives: 7
Not reviewed: 1

Out of 450 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 17 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 1 finding stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

4 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001, permissions-no-block, hooks-no-pretooluse · Files: .github/workflows/ci.yml, .github/workflows/release.yml, .vscode/settings.json · reported by agent-audit-kit, agentshield
3 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/.github/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

7 AAK-LEGAL-002
Files: package.json, packages/db/package.json, packages/typescript-config/package.json and 4 more · reported by agent-audit-kit
4 DATA_EXFIL_JS_FS_ACCESS
Files: /repo/apps/tanstack-start/src/mcp-todos.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 AAK-MCP-018
Files: apps/tanstack-start/src/routes/mcp.ts, apps/tanstack-start/src/utils/mcp-handler.ts, apps/tanstack-start/src/utils/demo.sse.ts · reported by agent-audit-kit
3 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/apps/nextjs/src/lib/api-client.ts, /repo/apps/tanstack-start/src/lib/api-client.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 GHSA-2vg6-77g8-24mp
Files: pnpm-lock.yaml, /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
3 GHSA-569q-mpph-wgww

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-11525
Files: pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy
1 GHSA-mwv9-gp5h-frr4
Files: pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy

Not reviewed

1 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: HIDDEN_DATA_FILE · Files: /repo/apps/nextjs/.env.local.example · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

Artifact contains critical vulnerabilities in dependencies.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-2w6w-674q-4c4q · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-3qcw-2rhx-2726 · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-9qr9-h5gf-34mp · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-g8mr-85jm-7xhm · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-mv8w-475r-vwqw · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-p63j-vcc4-9vmv · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

monorepo-starter

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged40

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at