divyansharma001/supereddit · Nerlo

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 589
Dismissed as false positives: 1
Not reviewed: 2

Out of 592 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 12 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 2 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

1 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/deploy.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

36 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/server/src/controllers/auth.controller.ts, /repo/server/src/controllers/subreddit.controller.ts, /repo/server/src/services/analytics.service.ts and 4 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
18 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-js-secret-to-network-egress
Files: /repo/client/src/app/socket-test/page.tsx, /repo/server/src/controllers/auth.controller.ts, /repo/server/src/controllers/subreddit.controller.ts and 4 more · reported by nerlo-behavioral
10 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-hardcoded-external-egress
Files: /repo/server/src/controllers/auth.controller.ts, /repo/server/src/controllers/subreddit.controller.ts, /repo/server/src/services/monitoring.optimized.ts and 2 more · reported by nerlo-behavioral
5 GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74
Files: /repo/client/bun.lock, /repo/client/package-lock.json, /repo/server/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
5 GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp
Files: /repo/client/bun.lock, /repo/client/package-lock.json, /repo/server/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
5 GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26

Not reviewed

2 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: HIDDEN_DATA_FILE · Files: /repo/server/.env.production.example · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and potential secret network egress identified.

The artifact contains multiple critical vulnerabilities in its dependencies, affecting both client and server components. Additionally, the code in `/repo/client/src/app/socket-test/page.tsx` and several controller files in `/repo/server/src/controllers/` exhibits behavior that could lead to network egress of sensitive information. The overall analyzability of the code is also low, which may obscure further issues.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-9qr9-h5gf-34mp · /repo/client/bun.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-9qr9-h5gf-34mp · /repo/client/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-f8cm-6447-x5h2 · /repo/client/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 · /repo/client/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-wfv2-pwc8-crg5 · /repo/client/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 · /repo/server/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2025-55182 · client/bun.lock · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2025-55182 · client/package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 21, 2026	Flagged21	—	agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 589
Dismissed as false positives: 1
Not reviewed: 2

Out of 592 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 12 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 2 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

1 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/deploy.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit

In installed code — never dismissed

36 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/server/src/controllers/auth.controller.ts, /repo/server/src/controllers/subreddit.controller.ts, /repo/server/src/services/analytics.service.ts and 4 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
18 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-js-secret-to-network-egress
Files: /repo/client/src/app/socket-test/page.tsx, /repo/server/src/controllers/auth.controller.ts, /repo/server/src/controllers/subreddit.controller.ts and 4 more · reported by nerlo-behavioral
10 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-hardcoded-external-egress
Files: /repo/server/src/controllers/auth.controller.ts, /repo/server/src/controllers/subreddit.controller.ts, /repo/server/src/services/monitoring.optimized.ts and 2 more · reported by nerlo-behavioral
5 GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74
Files: /repo/client/bun.lock, /repo/client/package-lock.json, /repo/server/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
5 GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp
Files: /repo/client/bun.lock, /repo/client/package-lock.json, /repo/server/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
5 GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26

Not reviewed

2 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: HIDDEN_DATA_FILE · Files: /repo/server/.env.production.example · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and potential secret network egress identified.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-9qr9-h5gf-34mp · /repo/client/bun.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-9qr9-h5gf-34mp · /repo/client/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-f8cm-6447-x5h2 · /repo/client/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 · /repo/client/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-wfv2-pwc8-crg5 · /repo/client/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 · /repo/server/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2025-55182 · client/bun.lock · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2025-55182 · client/package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

divyansharma001/supereddit

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (5)

agentshield

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (5)

agentshield

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged21

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at