mcp-this-openapi · Nerlo

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 101
Dismissed as false positives: 8
Not reviewed: 5

Out of 114 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 5 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 5 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

8 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-SSRF-002, SECRET_PASSWORD_VAR, AAK-TASKS-003 and 2 more · Files: tests/test_fastapi_validation.py, /repo/tests/test_auth.py, /repo/tests/test_openapi.py and 4 more · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

2 AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001
Files: pyproject.toml, uv.lock · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-c2jp-c369-7pvx
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-rcfx-77hg-w2wv
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
1 AAK-DNS-REBIND-002
Files: pyproject.toml · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-OAUTH-3P-001
Files: pyproject.toml · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 CVE-2025-54121

Not reviewed

5 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: TOOL_ABUSE_UNDECLARED_NETWORK, AAK-SEC-MD-001, HIDDEN_DATA_FILE and 2 more · Files: /repo/repo/README.md, SECURITY.md, /repo/.ruff.toml and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, agent-audit-kit

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities found in dependencies.

The artifact contains critical vulnerabilities in its dependencies, which could enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Specific findings indicate potential DNS rebinding risks and a vulnerability within an SDK. A high-severity finding in `src/mcp_this_openapi/config/loader.py` suggests a potential issue with configuration loading.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-287 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-338 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-36 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2026-27962 · uv.lock · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2026-32871 · uv.lock · critical · reported by trivy
AAK-DNS-REBIND-002 · pyproject.toml · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001 · pyproject.toml · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001 · uv.lock · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
· · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 20, 2026	Flagged44	—	agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 101
Dismissed as false positives: 8
Not reviewed: 5

Out of 114 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 5 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 5 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

8 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-SSRF-002, SECRET_PASSWORD_VAR, AAK-TASKS-003 and 2 more · Files: tests/test_fastapi_validation.py, /repo/tests/test_auth.py, /repo/tests/test_openapi.py and 4 more · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

2 AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001
Files: pyproject.toml, uv.lock · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-c2jp-c369-7pvx
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-rcfx-77hg-w2wv
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
1 AAK-DNS-REBIND-002
Files: pyproject.toml · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-OAUTH-3P-001
Files: pyproject.toml · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 CVE-2025-54121

Not reviewed

5 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: TOOL_ABUSE_UNDECLARED_NETWORK, AAK-SEC-MD-001, HIDDEN_DATA_FILE and 2 more · Files: /repo/repo/README.md, SECURITY.md, /repo/.ruff.toml and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, agent-audit-kit

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities found in dependencies.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-287 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-338 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-36 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2026-27962 · uv.lock · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2026-32871 · uv.lock · critical · reported by trivy
AAK-DNS-REBIND-002 · pyproject.toml · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001 · pyproject.toml · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001 · uv.lock · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
· · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

mcp-this-openapi

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

agentshield

capslock

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

agentshield

capslock

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged44

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at