keyphrases-mcp · Nerlo

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 259
Dismissed as false positives: 7
Not reviewed: 1

Out of 267 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 13 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 1 finding stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

4 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/docs/SKILL.md, /repo/tests/fixtures/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/pypi-publish.yml, .github/workflows/pulsemcp-publish.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-c2jp-c369-7pvx
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-rcfx-77hg-w2wv
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-rf74-v2fm-23pw
Files: /repo/uv.lock, uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
1 AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001
Files: uv.lock · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MCP-STATELESS-001
Files: src/server.py · reported by agent-audit-kit

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy

Not reviewed

1 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: HIDDEN_DATA_FILE · Files: /repo/.env-example · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities in dependencies and potential sensitive data exposure.

Critical vulnerabilities are present in several dependencies, as indicated by multiple PYSEC and CVE findings in `uv.lock`. The artifact may expose sensitive data, with a high severity finding related to `AAK-SECRET-004` in `src/config.py`. Potential resource abuse, specifically an infinite loop, was identified in `/repo/openai_agents_sdk/keyphrases_assistant.py`. Further high severity findings indicate potential issues with stateless components and SDK vulnerabilities.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2024-259 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2025-41 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2118 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2290 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-287 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-338 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-36 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-96 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-99 · · critical · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 21, 2026	Flagged41	—	agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 259
Dismissed as false positives: 7
Not reviewed: 1

Out of 267 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 13 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 1 finding stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

4 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/docs/SKILL.md, /repo/tests/fixtures/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/pypi-publish.yml, .github/workflows/pulsemcp-publish.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit

In installed code — never dismissed

2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-c2jp-c369-7pvx
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-rcfx-77hg-w2wv
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-rf74-v2fm-23pw
Files: /repo/uv.lock, uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
1 AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001
Files: uv.lock · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MCP-STATELESS-001
Files: src/server.py · reported by agent-audit-kit

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy

Not reviewed

1 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: HIDDEN_DATA_FILE · Files: /repo/.env-example · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities in dependencies and potential sensitive data exposure.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2024-259 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2025-41 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2118 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2290 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-287 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-338 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-36 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-96 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-99 · · critical · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

keyphrases-mcp

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

agentshield

capslock

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

agentshield

capslock

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged41

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at