fe · Nerlo

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 250
Dismissed as false positives: 5
Not reviewed: 79

Out of 334 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 14 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 79 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

4 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH · Files: /repo/docs/prompts/learn/Contract Demo.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/deploy.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

8 GHSA-96hv-2xvq-fx4p
Files: /repo/contracts/package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
5 GHSA-378v-28hj-76wf
Files: /repo/contracts/package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
5 GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p
Files: /repo/contracts/package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
5 GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj
Files: /repo/contracts/package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
4 CVE-2026-48779
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
4 DATA_EXFIL_JS_FS_ACCESS
Files: /repo/contracts/scripts/deploy.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4

Not reviewed

79 The review budget for this scan was already spent before these findings were reached.
Rules: CVE-2026-53666, GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385, GHSA-mmx7-hfxf-jppx and 59 more · Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/contracts/package-lock.json and 9 more · reported by trivy, osv-scanner, cisco-skill-scanner and 1 more

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and file system access capabilities detected.

The artifact includes multiple critical vulnerabilities in its dependencies, identified in `package-lock.json` files. High severity findings also indicate the capability for file system access and potential data exfiltration within `deploy.ts` scripts. Further high severity vulnerabilities are present in other dependencies, and the code's low analyzability may hinder comprehensive security assessment.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-2w6w-674q-4c4q · /repo/contracts/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-95m3-7q98-8xr5 · /repo/contracts/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 · /repo/contracts/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 · /repo/contracts/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-h7cp-r72f-jxh6 · /repo/contracts/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-v62p-rq8g-8h59 · /repo/contracts/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-vjh7-7g9h-fjfh · /repo/contracts/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
· · critical · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 19, 2026	Flagged37	—	agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 250
Dismissed as false positives: 5
Not reviewed: 79

Out of 334 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 14 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 79 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

4 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH · Files: /repo/docs/prompts/learn/Contract Demo.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/deploy.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

8 GHSA-96hv-2xvq-fx4p
Files: /repo/contracts/package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
5 GHSA-378v-28hj-76wf
Files: /repo/contracts/package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
5 GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p
Files: /repo/contracts/package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
5 GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj
Files: /repo/contracts/package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
4 CVE-2026-48779
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
4 DATA_EXFIL_JS_FS_ACCESS
Files: /repo/contracts/scripts/deploy.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4

Not reviewed

79 The review budget for this scan was already spent before these findings were reached.
Rules: CVE-2026-53666, GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385, GHSA-mmx7-hfxf-jppx and 59 more · Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/contracts/package-lock.json and 9 more · reported by trivy, osv-scanner, cisco-skill-scanner and 1 more

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and file system access capabilities detected.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-2w6w-674q-4c4q · /repo/contracts/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-95m3-7q98-8xr5 · /repo/contracts/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 · /repo/contracts/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 · /repo/contracts/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-h7cp-r72f-jxh6 · /repo/contracts/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-v62p-rq8g-8h59 · /repo/contracts/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-vjh7-7g9h-fjfh · /repo/contracts/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
· · critical · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

fe

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged37

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at