Loading the registry…
Personal blog built with Next.js and Hashnode API
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
3 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
This artifact ships from 2 sources and their verdicts differ. The worst is github (Flagged). Installing from a cleaner source does not mean the others are safe — check the source you actually install from.
github: https://github.com/shouryan01/blog, 39 findings
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI. Review the scanned source before copying them into your own project.
nerlo install -- blog
6 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 0.5s
v2.0.11
13 findings · 8.4s
v0.3.74
0 findings · 5.9s
v0.1.0
1 finding · 8.3s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 8.3s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 10.0s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source: complete | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 14 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 3 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 14 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
14 The review call did not complete.
Rules: COMMAND_INJECTION_EVAL, LOW_ANALYZABILITY, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-js-secret-to-network-egress and 9 more · Files: /repo/utils/renderer/highlight.js, /repo, /repo/components/analytics.tsx and 5 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, nerlo-behavioral
Critical command injection and secret exfiltration risks.
The artifact contains critical command injection vulnerabilities in `/repo/utils/renderer/highlight.js`, enabling shell execution. High-severity findings indicate potential secret exposure and network egress from `/repo/components/analytics.tsx`. Additional high-severity issues are present in `/repo/app/about/about-client.tsx`, `/repo/components/integrations.tsx`, `/repo/components/markdown-to-html.tsx`, and `/repo/utils/renderer/marked.js`. The artifact's low analyzability also warrants attention.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.