AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real

191

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 194 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 7 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

3 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-AGENT-002, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-run-bundled-artifact · Files: AGENTS.md, /repo/AGENTS.md · reported by agent-audit-kit, nerlo-install-instruction

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

3 AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001
Files: pyproject.toml, uv.lock, requirements.txt · reported by agent-audit-kit
3 GHSA-c2jp-c369-7pvx
Files: /repo/requirements.txt, /repo/uv.lock, uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
3 GHSA-rcfx-77hg-w2wv
Files: uv.lock, /repo/requirements.txt, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 PYSEC-2026-1364
Files: /repo/requirements.txt, /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
2 PYSEC-2026-1365
Files: /repo/requirements.txt, /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
2 PYSEC-2026-1617
Files: /repo/requirements.txt, /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities in installed dependencies

The artifact's installed code contains multiple critical vulnerabilities, primarily identified in its dependencies listed in `requirements.txt`, `uv.lock`, and `pyproject.toml`. These issues include several critical PYSEC and CVE entries, such as PYSEC-2026-338, CVE-2026-27962, and CVE-2026-32871. These findings indicate potential weaknesses that could be exploited, though specific capabilities like network egress or shell execution are not detailed in the provided findings.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-338 · /repo/requirements.txt · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2102 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-287 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-338 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-36 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2026-27962 · uv.lock · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2026-32871 · uv.lock · critical · reported by trivy
AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001 · pyproject.toml · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001 · · high · reported by agent-audit-kit

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real

191

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 194 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 7 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

3 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-AGENT-002, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-run-bundled-artifact · Files: AGENTS.md, /repo/AGENTS.md · reported by agent-audit-kit, nerlo-install-instruction

In installed code — never dismissed

3 AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001
Files: pyproject.toml, uv.lock, requirements.txt · reported by agent-audit-kit
3 GHSA-c2jp-c369-7pvx
Files: /repo/requirements.txt, /repo/uv.lock, uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
3 GHSA-rcfx-77hg-w2wv
Files: uv.lock, /repo/requirements.txt, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 PYSEC-2026-1364
Files: /repo/requirements.txt, /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
2 PYSEC-2026-1365
Files: /repo/requirements.txt, /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
2 PYSEC-2026-1617
Files: /repo/requirements.txt, /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities in installed dependencies

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-338 · /repo/requirements.txt · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2102 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-287 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-338 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-36 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2026-27962 · uv.lock · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2026-32871 · uv.lock · critical · reported by trivy
AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001 · pyproject.toml · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001 · · high · reported by agent-audit-kit

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

trading-mcp-py

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (5)

agentshield

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (5)

agentshield

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged44

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at