better-qdrant-mcp · Nerlo

better-qdrant-mcp

Version: v0.4.2
By: jtsang4
Last scan: Scanned Aug 21, 2026, 1:51 PM UTC

MCP Server

Flagged46composite

A Python MCP server for Qdrant memory storage and semantic search, compatible with Cursor-like MCP clients.

Source:: github.com/jtsang4/better-qdrant-mcp
Version:: 0.4.2
Author:: jtsang4
Provenance:: Found by crawling (provenance, not a security rating)

We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.

6 critical findings reported by trivy, osv-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.

pypi: better-qdrant-mcp @ 0.4.2, 0 findings

Install

Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.

nerlo install --target claude-code -- better-qdrant-mcp

Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.

How scores work Full audit report

Per-scanner reports

11 scanners

Your view:

7 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.

Scanners that examined this package (7)

cisco-skill-scanner
v2.0.11
Clean99
- 1Med
- 2Info
3 findings · 8.3s
agent-audit-kit
v0.3.74
Caution63
- 3High
- 6Med
- 1Low
- 1Info
11 findings · 1.3s

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 155
Dismissed as false positives: 8
Not reviewed: 0

Out of 163 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 6 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

5 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/docker-multi-image.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit
3 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-AGENT-002, FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH, AAK-AGENT-001 · Files: AGENTS.md, /repo/CLAUDE.md · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

2 GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j
Files: /repo/uv.lock, uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-rcfx-77hg-w2wv
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
1 AAK-MCP-018
Files: src/better_qdrant_mcp/tools.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MCP-HTTP-NOAUTH-SERVER-001
Files: src/better_qdrant_mcp/tools.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001
Files: uv.lock · reported by agent-audit-kit

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities found in artifact dependencies.

The artifact includes dependencies with critical vulnerabilities that could lead to remote code execution or denial of service. Additionally, a high-severity finding indicates an unauthenticated HTTP server in `src/better_qdrant_mcp/tools.py`, which could allow unauthorized network access. Multiple other high-severity vulnerabilities are present in various dependencies, as listed in `uv.lock`.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-2118 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-287 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-338 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-36 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2026-27962 · uv.lock · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2026-32871 · uv.lock · critical · reported by trivy
AAK-MCP-HTTP-NOAUTH-SERVER-001 · src/better_qdrant_mcp/tools.py · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001 · uv.lock · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 21, 2026	Flagged46	—	agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 155
Dismissed as false positives: 8
Not reviewed: 0

Out of 163 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 6 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

5 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/docker-multi-image.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit
3 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-AGENT-002, FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH, AAK-AGENT-001 · Files: AGENTS.md, /repo/CLAUDE.md · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

2 GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j
Files: /repo/uv.lock, uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-rcfx-77hg-w2wv
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
1 AAK-MCP-018
Files: src/better_qdrant_mcp/tools.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MCP-HTTP-NOAUTH-SERVER-001
Files: src/better_qdrant_mcp/tools.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001
Files: uv.lock · reported by agent-audit-kit

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities found in artifact dependencies.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-2118 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-287 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-338 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-36 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2026-27962 · uv.lock · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2026-32871 · uv.lock · critical · reported by trivy
AAK-MCP-HTTP-NOAUTH-SERVER-001 · src/better_qdrant_mcp/tools.py · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001 · uv.lock · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

better-qdrant-mcp

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

agentshield

capslock

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

agentshield

capslock

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged46

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at