verdictswarm-mcp · Nerlo

verdictswarm-mcp

Version: v0.2.1
By: Sentien Labs
License: MIT
Last scan: Scanned Aug 3, 2026, 5:31 PM UTC

MCP Server

Flagged40composite

Every tool has an answer — your agent needs a decision. MCP server for the VerdictSwarm pre-trade check: a machine-readable avoid/caution/clear before your agent trades, plus intended-size exit feasibility and holder-cluster attribution on Solana.

Source:: github.com/sentien-labs/verdictswarm-mcp
Version:: 0.2.1
License:: MIT
Author:: Sentien Labs
Provenance:: Publisher-attested (provenance, not a security rating)
Registry namespace:: io.github.sentien-labs

The publisher performed an authenticated act of publication — proving control of a namespace in the official MCP registry, or appearing in a first-party catalogue an operator curates. That establishes WHO published it. It is not a security finding, and attested artifacts carry Flagged verdicts too.

1 critical finding reported by osv-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.

pypi: verdictswarm-mcp @ 0.2.1, 0 findings

Install

Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.

nerlo install --target claude-code -- verdictswarm-mcp

Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.

How scores work Full audit report

Per-scanner reports

9 scanners

Your view:

7 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.

Scanners that examined this package (7)

cisco-skill-scanner
v2.0.11
Clean91
- 1Med
- 8Info
9 findings · 6.5s

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 61
Dismissed as false positives: 12
Not reviewed: 0

Out of 73 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 1 finding rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

6 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME · Files: /repo/.github/SKILL.md, /repo/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
6 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-SECRET-004, AAK-SECRET-007 · Files: examples/basic_usage.py, examples/windsurf.json, examples/claude_desktop_config.json and 2 more · reported by agent-audit-kit

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

2 GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j
Files: /repo/uv.lock, uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
1 CVE-2025-71176
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-28684
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-32597
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-34073
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-39892

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerability and network egress of secrets detected.

A critical vulnerability (PYSEC-2026-36) is present in a dependency. The artifact also exhibits high severity network egress of secrets from `/repo/src/verdictswarm_mcp/api_client.py`. Additionally, multiple other high severity vulnerabilities are identified in various dependencies.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-36 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-py-secret-to-network-egress · /repo/src/verdictswarm_mcp/api_client.py · high · reported by nerlo-behavioral
GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-120 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-179 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2132 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2281 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-249 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-3036 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 3, 2026	Flagged40	—	agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completenerlo-multi-source: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 61
Dismissed as false positives: 12
Not reviewed: 0

Out of 73 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 1 finding rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

6 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME · Files: /repo/.github/SKILL.md, /repo/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
6 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-SECRET-004, AAK-SECRET-007 · Files: examples/basic_usage.py, examples/windsurf.json, examples/claude_desktop_config.json and 2 more · reported by agent-audit-kit

In installed code — never dismissed

2 GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j
Files: /repo/uv.lock, uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
1 CVE-2025-71176
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-28684
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-32597
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-34073
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-39892

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerability and network egress of secrets detected.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-36 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-py-secret-to-network-egress · /repo/src/verdictswarm_mcp/api_client.py · high · reported by nerlo-behavioral
GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-120 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-179 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2132 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2281 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-249 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-3036 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

verdictswarm-mcp

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

agentshield

trivy (image)

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

agentshield

trivy (image)

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged40

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at