AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real

244

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 251 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 10 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

4 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/test.yml, .github/workflows/build.yml, .github/workflows/lint.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit
3 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/.github/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

6 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/packages/blocknumber/src/providers/blockmetaJsonBlockNumberProvider.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
5 LOW_ANALYZABILITY
Files: /repo/packages/shared, /repo/apps/agent, /repo and 2 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
5 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/packages/blocknumber/SKILL.md, /repo/packages/automated-dispute/SKILL.md and 2 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
5 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/packages/blocknumber/SKILL.md, /repo/packages/automated-dispute/SKILL.md and 2 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 AAK-LEGAL-002
Files: packages/blocknumber/package.json, packages/automated-dispute/package.json, packages/shared/package.json and 1 more · reported by agent-audit-kit
3

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-11525
Files: pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and potential data exfiltration identified.

The artifact contains multiple critical vulnerabilities in its dependencies, primarily identified in `pnpm-lock.yaml`. Additionally, the code in `/repo/apps/agent/src/config/index.ts` has capabilities for file system access, which could lead to data exfiltration. There are also findings indicating potential credential access in `.env.example` and `eboProcessorV2.ts`.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-3qcw-2rhx-2726 · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-9crc-q9x8-hgqq · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-9crc-q9x8-hgqq · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-9crc-q9x8-hgqq · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
· · critical · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real

244

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 251 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 10 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

4 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/test.yml, .github/workflows/build.yml, .github/workflows/lint.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit
3 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/.github/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

6 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/packages/blocknumber/src/providers/blockmetaJsonBlockNumberProvider.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
5 LOW_ANALYZABILITY
Files: /repo/packages/shared, /repo/apps/agent, /repo and 2 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
5 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/packages/blocknumber/SKILL.md, /repo/packages/automated-dispute/SKILL.md and 2 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
5 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/packages/blocknumber/SKILL.md, /repo/packages/automated-dispute/SKILL.md and 2 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 AAK-LEGAL-002
Files: packages/blocknumber/package.json, packages/automated-dispute/package.json, packages/shared/package.json and 1 more · reported by agent-audit-kit
3

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-11525
Files: pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and potential data exfiltration identified.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-3qcw-2rhx-2726 · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-9crc-q9x8-hgqq · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-9crc-q9x8-hgqq · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-9crc-q9x8-hgqq · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
· · critical · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

ebo-agent

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged35

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at