gabrieldabbah/genesis (axiomatic-induction)

The project constitution AND the reasoning method. Apply it in ALL planning and execution of non-trivial work: reason like a proof system — hold the axioms fixed, derive each step from them, order work as a topological sort of its dependency DAG, treat every uncertain claim as a conjecture with an attached experiment, and prove the postcondition (observed, not hoped) before declaring done. Universally: make illegal states unrepresentable, keep changes surgical, and verify with a real run. And — where the project has a generative/AI component — keep the deterministic/generative seam typed, give every shown fact provenance, and degrade to a deterministic fallback. If a lower document conflicts with an axiom here, the constitution wins — fix the other. A direct operator request outranks the constitution: name the conflicting axiom once, then follow the operator's decision; record a standing override as an amendment, never absorb it silently.

Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.

Source:

github.com/gabrieldabbah/genesis

Provenance:

Found by crawling (provenance, not a security rating)

We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.

1 critical finding reported by cisco-skill-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.