AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real

588

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 590 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 4 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

2 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: agents-comment-injection-535, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-run-bundled-artifact · Files: CLAUDE.md, /repo/nimi2d/AGENTS.md · reported by agentshield, nerlo-install-instruction

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

12 CVE-2025-3000
Files: runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/media-pipeline-cpu/uv.lock, runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/media-pipeline-cu126/uv.lock, runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-asr-package-cpu/uv.lock and 5 more · reported by trivy
12 GHSA-rrmf-rvhw-rf47
Files: /repo/runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/media-pipeline-cpu/uv.lock, /repo/runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/media-pipeline-cu126/uv.lock, /repo/runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-asr-package-cpu/uv.lock and 5 more · reported by osv-scanner
11 GHSA-wrw7-89jp-8q8g
Files: apps/avatar/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, apps/tester/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, archive/apps/forge/src-tauri/Cargo.lock and 8 more · reported by trivy
11 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-run-bundled-artifact
Files: /repo/scripts/install-windows-runtime-service.ps1 · reported by nerlo-install-instruction
10 GHSA-7gcf-g7xr-8hxj
Files: apps/tester/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, archive/apps/forge/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, archive/apps/lookdev/src-tauri/Cargo.lock and 7 more · reported by trivy
9 CVE-2026-42184

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

9 GHSA-4w2j-m93h-cj5j
Files: archive/apps/forge/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, archive/apps/lookdev/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, archive/apps/moment/src-tauri/Cargo.lock and 6 more · reported by trivy
8 GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh
Files: archive/apps/forge/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, archive/apps/lookdev/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, archive/apps/moment/src-tauri/Cargo.lock and 5 more · reported by trivy
6 CVE-2026-54282
Files: runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-asr-package-cpu/uv.lock, runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-asr-package-cu128/uv.lock, runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-asr-transformers-cpu/uv.lock and 3 more · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-39821
Files: runtime/go.mod · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and potential sensitive data exfiltration.

The artifact contains critical vulnerabilities identified in Python dependencies, specifically PYSEC-2026-2290, which appear in multiple `uv.lock` files. Numerous high severity vulnerabilities are also present across various dependencies. Behavioral analysis indicates potential for sensitive data, including secrets, to be exfiltrated over the network from JavaScript files, and for clipboard content to be read and exfiltrated from `mjs` files. These findings warrant careful review due to the potential for data exposure and system compromise.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-2290 · /repo/runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-asr-package-cpu/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2290 · /repo/runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-asr-package-cu128/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2290 · /repo/runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-tts-cpu/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2290 · /repo/runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-tts-cu128/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-js-secret-to-network-egress · /repo/archive/apps/relay/src/main/auth/oauth-token-exchange.ts · high · reported by nerlo-behavioral
· · high · reported by nerlo-behavioral

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real

588

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 590 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 4 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

2 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: agents-comment-injection-535, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-run-bundled-artifact · Files: CLAUDE.md, /repo/nimi2d/AGENTS.md · reported by agentshield, nerlo-install-instruction

In installed code — never dismissed

12 CVE-2025-3000
Files: runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/media-pipeline-cpu/uv.lock, runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/media-pipeline-cu126/uv.lock, runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-asr-package-cpu/uv.lock and 5 more · reported by trivy
12 GHSA-rrmf-rvhw-rf47
Files: /repo/runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/media-pipeline-cpu/uv.lock, /repo/runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/media-pipeline-cu126/uv.lock, /repo/runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-asr-package-cpu/uv.lock and 5 more · reported by osv-scanner
11 GHSA-wrw7-89jp-8q8g
Files: apps/avatar/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, apps/tester/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, archive/apps/forge/src-tauri/Cargo.lock and 8 more · reported by trivy
11 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-run-bundled-artifact
Files: /repo/scripts/install-windows-runtime-service.ps1 · reported by nerlo-install-instruction
10 GHSA-7gcf-g7xr-8hxj
Files: apps/tester/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, archive/apps/forge/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, archive/apps/lookdev/src-tauri/Cargo.lock and 7 more · reported by trivy
9 CVE-2026-42184

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

9 GHSA-4w2j-m93h-cj5j
Files: archive/apps/forge/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, archive/apps/lookdev/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, archive/apps/moment/src-tauri/Cargo.lock and 6 more · reported by trivy
8 GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh
Files: archive/apps/forge/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, archive/apps/lookdev/src-tauri/Cargo.lock, archive/apps/moment/src-tauri/Cargo.lock and 5 more · reported by trivy
6 CVE-2026-54282
Files: runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-asr-package-cpu/uv.lock, runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-asr-package-cu128/uv.lock, runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-asr-transformers-cpu/uv.lock and 3 more · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-39821
Files: runtime/go.mod · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and potential sensitive data exfiltration.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-2290 · /repo/runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-asr-package-cpu/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2290 · /repo/runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-asr-package-cu128/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2290 · /repo/runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-tts-cpu/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2290 · /repo/runtime/internal/engine/assets/python-profiles/speech-tts-cu128/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-js-secret-to-network-egress · /repo/archive/apps/relay/src/main/auth/oauth-token-exchange.ts · high · reported by nerlo-behavioral
· · high · reported by nerlo-behavioral

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

@nimiplatform/nimi

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (8)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

capslock

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (3)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (8)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

capslock

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (3)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged34

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at