@codefundi/code-fundi-mcp · Nerlo

@codefundi/code-fundi-mcp

Version: v0.1.4
By: Code Fundi <hi@codefundi.app>
License: MIT
Last scan: Scanned Sep 11, 2026, 7:40 PM UTC

MCP Server

Flagged49composite

MCP server for CodeFundi: the codebase map and blast-radius guard for AI coding agents like Claude Code, Cursor, and Copilot.

Source:: github.com/Code-Fundi/code-fundi-mcp
Version:: 0.1.4
License:: MIT
Author:: Code Fundi <hi@codefundi.app>
Provenance:: Publisher-attested (provenance, not a security rating)
Registry namespace:: io.github.FelixWaweru

The publisher performed an authenticated act of publication — proving control of a namespace in the official MCP registry, or appearing in a first-party catalogue an operator curates. That establishes WHO published it. It is not a security finding, and attested artifacts carry Flagged verdicts too.

npm: @codefundi/code-fundi-mcp @ 0.1.4, 0 findings

Install

Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.

nerlo install --target claude-code -- @codefundi/code-fundi-mcp

Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.

How scores work Full audit report

Per-scanner reports

11 scanners

Your view:

8 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.

Scanners that examined this package (8)

agentshield
v1.4.0
Clean100
- No findings
0 findings · 0.5s
cisco-skill-scanner
v2.0.11
Clean97
- 6Info
6 findings · 6.6s

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 187
Dismissed as false positives: 2
Not reviewed: 0

Out of 189 findings across every scanner that examined this package.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

2 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/ci.yml, .github/workflows/release.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

4 GHSA-82fw-gwwq-j7x9
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by osv-scanner
3 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/src/client.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 CVE-2026-18446
Files: package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy
2 CVE-2026-69207
Files: package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy
2 CVE-2026-71848
Files: package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy
2 CVE-2026-71849
Files: package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy
2 CVE-2026-71850
Files: package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy
2

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

2 CVE-2026-75975
Files: package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-11525
Files: pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Numerous high-severity vulnerabilities in dependencies

This artifact contains multiple high-severity vulnerabilities identified in its installed dependencies, as indicated by findings in `package-lock.json` and `pnpm-lock.yaml`. These vulnerabilities could potentially lead to various security risks, including remote code execution, denial of service, or information disclosure. Reviewing these findings is essential to understand the specific capabilities that could be affected if these vulnerabilities are exploited.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-5jgf-p345-68v8 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-7p8r-x3mc-p8w7 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-f65p-4m7j-42xc · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-fph4-wmhf-6fwf · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-jqff-g426-hqxp · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-28wg-ghj8-5hjv · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8 · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

2 scans on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Sep 11, 2026	Flagged49	—	agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed
Jul 29, 2026	Flagged48	—	cisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completenerlo-multi-source: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 187
Dismissed as false positives: 2
Not reviewed: 0

Out of 189 findings across every scanner that examined this package.

Why those were dismissed

2 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/ci.yml, .github/workflows/release.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit

In installed code — never dismissed

4 GHSA-82fw-gwwq-j7x9
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by osv-scanner
3 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/src/client.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 CVE-2026-18446
Files: package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy
2 CVE-2026-69207
Files: package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy
2 CVE-2026-71848
Files: package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy
2 CVE-2026-71849
Files: package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy
2 CVE-2026-71850
Files: package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy
2

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

2 CVE-2026-75975
Files: package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-11525
Files: pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Numerous high-severity vulnerabilities in dependencies

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-5jgf-p345-68v8 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-7p8r-x3mc-p8w7 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-f65p-4m7j-42xc · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-fph4-wmhf-6fwf · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-jqff-g426-hqxp · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-28wg-ghj8-5hjv · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8 · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

@codefundi/code-fundi-mcp

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (8)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (3)

capslock

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (8)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (3)

capslock

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged49

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at